In fact, for every adjustment layer you can choose "Blend Option": a new panel appears, and in the right graph (as per figure) you can choose where the adjustment will be applied and where not, based on the pixel luminance. But a very short research showed me that in AP there is an even more powerful tool for doing the same, and it is called " Blend ranges": the point is that you can choose how an adjustment layer blends in the image, based upon the luminosity. Probably the most important thing for landscape photographers is the ability to use luminosity masks to selectively control the adjustments at the beginning I was quite worried to loose them, working in Affinity Photo. I did another test with my Parrot Anafi DNG, and even in this case Affinity was not able to set a profile (Lightroom is able to get it). But Affinity does not have a drop down field to manually select a profile. This is quite obvious because Laowa does not have a chip. Affinity was able to identify my Sony SEL lenses (and to apply a correct profile), but not my Laowa. The only thing I was not able to test is the availability of lens profiles. There are some little tweaks you will have to do, in order to re-gain the interface you are used to, but really minor issues (for example, move some panels).Īffinity for landscape photographers Raw developmentĭo not worry, you won't miss the friendly sliders of Camera Raw, that we are used to!Īs soon as you open a raw file, Affinity Photo shows a window with the typical settings we have to apply to a file before switching to the "real" post production. So, you will find more or less the same keyboard shortcuts (not exactly all of them, but let's say 95% of the most used ones), very similar names, panel disposition, filters, etcĮven the icons are similar, probably a bit nicer (even if Photoshop icons seems to be more "professional"). This is a great simple concept, isn't it? but I'm not an R&D department, so I have to make choices based on a costs/benefits approach.Īffinity Photo seems to be developed with a clear idea: not to frighten curious Photoshop users. For example, I have to admit that in the past I tested DxO Photolab and Capture One, but the initial effort was so high that I gave up immediately. Usually, switching from a well-known software to a completely new one is a nightmare. Now, after more than 4 years, I went back to see how things are going. I tested Affinity Photo when it was in beta version, and I found it a great and visionary piece of software. so the total cost is getting even higher! But in the end, it is quite expensive last but not least, Photoshop is working great, but I need more and more external plugins. Moreover, the (obvious) perfect integration between Lightroom and Photoshop make the Photography suite a great choice for creatives. It's been a while since I started using the whole Adobe Photography plan I really love to use Lightroom to create a searchable catalogue of all my shots, and then make the first adjustments on the raw files. However: Give me your mail or look here from day to day (in a week). I would be interested if you finished your macros! i will announce the first show-wheel also here! I´m more this own-world-engineer-typ - it took very long if i am happy with my own stuff! So, most of the macros a at least a year or even more old (and reworked), NOW i am happy with it, NOW i can give them my name! Yeah, ist advertising-speech, but i´m not steve jobs or any other show-man-boaster. If anyone is interested, PM me your email and you will get informed! All really "early birds" can then buy before release for the half-price (of the regular, always cheap-price)! In a week or so (as soon as the site is standing) i will publish some videos. I have first to do some other jobs (creating website, videos, become a trader.) but i think in a month or so, you can buy my stuff (for pocket-money). These packages will be not free, but available just for a pocket-money. Believe me, this stuff is amazing, funny, fresh, easy to use.! ![]() ![]() and the behavior is more smart/intelligent. There are also very unique FX you miss in PS-gallery. But most of them are running in "realtime" (at least with moderate resolutions and some free RAM). Most of them are running in "realtime", some needs some power/time, especially with really high resolutions. You do not have to worry about something, you will always get a FX-copy of the choosen layer, or of just the quick-mask! In lot of variations and with 2-5 sliders for finetuning. Also nice generators and backgrounds, textures-FX. I have created lot of high-complex, but very smart macros which gives you same (or even better) results than PS-Filtergallery (oilpaint, watercolor, cutout, plastic.).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |